I haven’t done one of these in a while (almost a year, geez) so hang tight, there’s a lot of reading material here. In the interest of organization, these will be roughly grouped by theme. Obviously the groupings are roughly drawn, and there’s a lot of overlap; I recommend that you just read all of them, though admittedly it might take a while.
Grief, tragedy, and hard things
The New Yorker: “When Things Go Missing” by Kathryn Schulz
I genuinely can’t pull a quote from this beautiful piece that sums it up; it begins, innocuously whimsical, and then crescendos in depth and intensity.
GQ: “The Man Who Cleans Up After Plane Crashes” by Lauren Larson
Jensen doesn’t have any harrowing rescue stories. He’s looking for something of more abstract value—a piece of a person, literal or figurative, that he can bring back to a victim’s family to say “We tried.” He knows from experience that when a person’s life has been obliterated, even the tiniest shards can bring solace.
New York Times Magazine: “‘I Have No Choice but to Keep Looking‘” by Jennifer Percy
“I expected it to be difficult,” Takamatsu said, “and I’ve found it quite difficult, but it is the only thing I can do. I have no choice but to keep looking for her. I feel closest to her in the ocean.”
New York Times: “Patton Oswalt: ‘I’ll Never Be at 100 Percent Again‘” by Jason Zinoman
“Grief is an attack on life. It’s not a seducer. It’s an ambush or worse. It stands right out there and says: ‘The minute you try something, I’m waiting for you.’”
Glamour: “Stanford Sexual Assault Case Survivor Emily Doe Speaks Out“
“Victims are not victims, not some fragile, sorrowful aftermath. Victims are survivors, and survivors are going to be doing a hell of a lot more than surviving.”
The Guardian: “Monica Lewinsky: ‘The shame sticks to you like tar’” by Jon Ronson
Lewinsky’s outlook on her scandal has been doggedly non-ideological from the start. “I’m endlessly fascinated by how people derive meaning in life,” she says, “the chasm between how idealised people pretend life is and how complex we really are.”
Cracked: “This is What Safe Spaces and Trigger Warnings Actually Are” by Isaac Cabe
Trigger warnings and safe spaces get so conflated because they’re both meant to evoke the same criticism — that we’re coddling college students instead of exposing them to new ideas. But if a student has been so damaged by a previous experience that they literally can’t focus on the lesson, then something needs to be done to help that student. We’re not “preparing students for the real world” by re-exposing them to things from the real world that have already messed them up pretty bad.
Buzzfeed: “The Past Hundred Years of Gender-Segregated Public Restrooms” by Shannon Keating
Concerns about secretions, disease, and physical threats to the body are vessels through which deeper and more significant anxieties — regarding gender, sex, shame, and power — have been codified into law and reified by social norms over the span of decades.
Lucky Peach: “The History of Pho” by Andrea Nguyen
Vietnam is a country with a history spanning more than 3,500 years, but pho is a relatively new food. It was born at the beginning of the twentieth century in and around Hanoi, the capital of Vietnam, located in the northern part of the country.
Smithsonian: “‘The Hatpin Peril’ Terrorized Men Who Couldn’t Handle the 20th-Century Woman” by Karen Abbott
“If the men of Chicago want to take the hatpins away from us, let them make the streets safe,” she said. “No man has a right to tell me how I shall dress and what I shall wear.”
Note: The above quote was from 1910.
London Review of Books: “Royal Bodies” by Hilary Mantel
Women, their bodies, their reproductive capacities, their animal nature, are central to the story. The history of the reign is so graphically gynaecological that in the past it enabled lady novelists to write about sex when they were only supposed to write about love; and readers could take an avid interest in what went on in royal bedrooms by dignifying it as history, therefore instructive, edifying. Popular fiction about the Tudors has also been a form of moral teaching about women’s lives, though what is taught varies with moral fashion.
New York Times: “Refugees Encounter a Foreign Word: Welcome” by Jodi Kantor and Catrin Einhorn
As sponsors sign the paperwork that commits them, no one really explains the potential range of their unofficial duties: showing a newcomer to spit in a dentist’s sink by miming the motions, rushing over late at night to calm a war-rattled family terrified by a garage door blown open by the wind, or using Google Translate to tell children who lived through war and exile that they are supposed to wear pink at school for anti-bullying day.
New York Times: “What Does it Mean to Help One Family?” by Jodi Kantor and Catrin Einhorn
The family was living through the first refugee crisis in history in which people without countries or homes could communicate instantaneously with one another. Previous generations of refugees often ached for any information about relatives, but now messages zipped back and forth around the world on free apps. The joy of such regular communication came at a steep cost: constant updates on the misery of relatives left behind, intensifying worry and impeding progress for those trying to carve out a new life.
Note: There’s a third part to the series that this and the above article belong in, but I have a backlog of several hundred (!) articles to get through and I haven’t gotten to that one yet.
Washington Post: “How to be an American: Syrian refugees find a home in Trump country” by Robert Samuels
“Now I am concerned about how they will treat me if they agree with the president, if they will treat me in a racist way,” she said. “I worry this ban will change how I feel inside, that it will cause me to worry more for me and my kids. We did not come here to cause trouble. We just want to live.”
Washington Post: “Trump says Syrian refugees aren’t vetted. We are. Here’s what we went through.” by Linda J.
Each member of the family told their story, and those stories had to be consistent with interviews given by other people who knew us. If our answers didn’t match information U.S. officials already had, or if they couldn’t validate our information, we didn’t progress to the next step. I had only a glimmer of hope that this would work — and that we could have a safe life for my daughters. We lived on that hope.
Washington Post: “Anne Frank and her family were also denied entry as refugees to the U.S.” by Elahe Izadi
But as the Frank family filed paperwork, immigration rules were changing — and attitudes in the United States toward immigrants from Europe were becoming increasingly suspicious, Breitman wrote. The American government was making it harder for foreigners to get into the country — and the Nazis were making it difficult to leave.
Refinery 29: “I Work Alongside You Every Day —But Depending On Who Wins The Election, I Could Be Forced To Leave” by Fiona Marlie Rezei
In my case, a win for Donald Trump could mean leaving my immediate family, my friends, and my job to return to a country I haven’t seen since I was 10 years old.
The fear of losing the life I have built for myself over the past 15 years crystalized when I turned in my final college assignment almost three years ago. I should have been ecstatic, relieved, and happy; excited for what the future would hold like my other cap-and-gown-donning classmates.
New York Times: “Dalai Lama: Behind Our Anxiety, the Fear of Being Unneeded” by the Dalai Lama and Arthur C. Brooks
This helps explain why pain and indignation are sweeping through prosperous countries. The problem is not a lack of material riches. It is the growing number of people who feel they are no longer useful, no longer needed, no longer one with their societies.
Note: This isn’t just about immigration, but I’m kind of stuck as to how to categorize this, so here it stays.
The New Yorker: “Making Art in a Time of Rage” by Alex Ross
What is the point of making beautiful things, or of cherishing the beauty of the past, when ugliness runs rampant? Those who work in the realm of the arts have been asking themselves that question in recent weeks. The election of Donald Trump, and the casual cruelty of his Presidency thus far, have precipitated a sense of crisis in that world, not least because Trump seems inclined to let the arts rot.
The Guardian: “Lemony Snicket: ‘The problem with being interested in classical music is that people look at you funny” by Daniel Handler
You might be sitting with friends talking about pop music, or what you’ve read or seen on television, and everyone’s on the same page. And then you say “Yeah, it reminds me of that Shostakovich quartet, that chord at the end” and there’s a chill in the room, and the mood is killed. I thought if I seduced more people into the world of classical music I wouldn’t be as lonely and wretched.
Huffington Post: “Why Musicians Need Silence in an Always-Connected World” [Interview with Stephen Hough] by Carlos Gardels
So there is a need in the arts to delve deep, and to live with the material and let it be absorbed. This is very important. It’s related to any kind of growth. The Internet tempts us to think that because an email or a new website can be accessed in seconds that everything works at the same instant speed. Art is more like the growth of a plant. It needs time and space.
Creative Review: “How the Toronto Symphony Orchestra uses graphic design to guide audiences” by Mark Sinclair
Instead of quoting the article, I’m just going to tell you that I got a nerdgasm from this, having gotten a minor in graphic design in addition to my major (and another minor) in music.
Feminism & Toxic Masculinity
Bustle: “On Newt Scamander, Toxic Masculinity, and the Power of Hufflepuff Heroes” by Emma Lord
Newt Scamander takes every trope we know about the Male Hero — the toxic tropes that we have grown up with, that are so internalized in traditional narratives that we don’t even blink at them anymore — and flips them on their head.
Newsweek: “Women of the CIA: The Hidden History of American Spycraft” by Abigail Jones
Women have been central to American spycraft since 1776, and they continued to play important roles in the World War II–era Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the CIA’s predecessor. Even so, the agency has a long history as a chauvinistic old boys’ club rife with sexism. “People treat it as only men have a calling to serve their country and it’s unnatural for women to do it,” Bennett says. “Women have been extremely involved and integral! It burns me up to no end. Women in intelligence is not new. We’ve always been important, and there’s nothing strange with us wanting to do this role.”
The Atlantic: “Not Wanting Kids is Entirely Normal” by Jessica Valenti
American culture can’t accept the reality of a woman who does not want to be a mother. It goes against everything we’ve been taught to think about women and how desperately they want babies. If we’re to believe the media and pop culture, women — even teen girls — are forever desperate for a baby. It’s our greatest desire.
Cracked: “7 Reasons So Many Guys Don’t Understand Sexual Consent” by David Wong
No, the alternative is to recognize that ridding guys of toxic attitudes toward women is a monumental task. I’ve spent two solid decades trying to deprogram myself, to get on board with something that, in retrospect, should be patently obvious to any decent person. Changing actions is the easy part; changing urges takes years and years. It’s the difference between going on a diet and training your body to not get hungry at all.
Vox: “The research is clear: electing more women changes how government works” by Sarah Kliff
Changing the conversation can have an effect on the laws that Congress eventually passes: One recent study of Congress since 2009 found that the average female legislator had 2.31 of her bills enacted, compared with men, who turned 1.57 bills into law.
Boing Boing: “To find Hillary Clinton likable, we must learn to view women as complex beings” by Caroline Siede
Our movies, books, and TV shows are filled with attractive female love interests, badass female warriors, hissable female villains, and bumbling female leads. But we don’t have very many female protagonists who are allowed to be flawed in ways that are messily realistic not just charmingly endearing. We haven’t been taught to empathize with flawed women the way we have with flawed men.
Miscellaneous Fascinating Things
Racked: “Perfume, Power, and God” by Arabelle Sicardi
Perfume made you lose your head, forced you to face God sooner.
I’m fascinated by this connection between god and perfume and power. What’s the power of smell and how is it linked to politics? And have they always been linked like so?
The Economist/1843 Magazine: “Demand Curve” by Brooke Unger
The authors of “Signalling status with luxury goods: the role of brand prominence”, which appeared in the Journal of Marketing in 2010, do so by dividing the rich into two groups: “parvenus”, who want to associate themselves with other rich people and distinguish themselves from have-nots, and “patricians”, who want to signal to each other but not to the masses. They theorise that more expensive luxury goods, aimed at patricians, will have less obvious branding than cheaper ones.
New Republic: “Across the Broken Bridge” by Suki Kim
Shenyang and Dandong, filled with North Korean defectors, contract workers, and government officials, are notorious hubs of sensitive information on North Korea, and I was hoping to learn something new.
NY Mag: “10 Extremely Precise Words for Emotions You Didn’t Even Know You Had” by Melissa Dahl
Priceonomics: “The Campaign to Make You Eat Kimchi” by Sarah Scharf
As it turns out, so-called ‘gastro-diplomacy’ is gaining traction as a valuable form of international relationship building and stimulus for tourism. As Public Diplomacy magazine notes, these countries “have recognized the seductive qualities food can have, and are leveraging this unique medium of cultural diplomacy to increase trade, economic investment, and tourism, as well as to enhance soft power.”
Outside Online: “The Bears Who Came to Town and Would Not Go Away” by Sarah A. Topol
First there were a few, then a dozen, then many more—the bears were showing up around Luchegorsk at a rate of up to ten per day. They moved in elongated convoys, following each other down the same paths through open fields, like they had all locked onto the same GPS route and the coordinates led straight to Luchegorsk.
Priceonomics: “How an Ad Campaign Made Lesbians Fall in Love with Subaru” by Alex Mayyasi
This was the type of discovery that the small, struggling automaker was looking for. But Subaru had been looking for niche groups like skiers and kayakers—not lesbian couples. Did the company want to make advertisements for gay customers? At the time, in the mid 1990s, few celebrities were openly out. A Democratic president had just passed “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”, and after IKEA aired one of the first major ad campaigns depicting a gay couple, someone had called in a bomb threat on an IKEA store.
Buzzfeed: “How Taylor Swift Played The Victim For A Decade And Made Her Entire Career” by Ellie Woodward
By teasing the press and public in this way, Swift has been able to control the narrative around her relationships, ensure sustained media attention, and bolster record sales. She has created a narrative so compelling, so regular in its offerings, so melodramatic, that it’s reminiscent of a soap opera – it’s impossible to look away. Each instalment is thoroughly analysed: Of course we want to know the next episode. She’s taught the public – gradually, cleverly – to cling to the next development. Why are the public so obsessed with her relationships? Because she makes them irresistible.
LA Times: “Framed” by Christopher Goddard
This is a long read in six parts, but it’s extremely interested and really well-written; highly recommend.